Certain Heresies Are Ok For TGC and Keller and Piper

If this episode, and everything leading up to it, does not conclusively prove the utterly worldly nature of TGC^TM, nothing else will. TGC's statement is so blatantly hypocritical I am almost speechless as to its audacity. Keller invites NPP proponent NT Wright to speak at a center connected to Redeemer Presbyterian = OK (not divisive). Keller attacks the foundation of the Gospel by promoting theistic evolution = OK (not divisive). John Piper invites Federal Vision heretic Douglas Wilson to the 2009 Desiring God conference = OK (not divisive). Piper subsequently invites semi-Pelagian revivalist Rick Warren to DG10 = OK (not divisive). But Pastor Tullian teaches on the Law/Gospel distinction and a particular view of sanctification = being divisive? So let me get this straight. One can promote a heretic who denies the Gospel, one can attack the foundation of the Gospel, but one cannot teach on the Law/Gospel distinction? I guess TGC^TM is really the Gospel^TMCoalition^TM, where the Coalition is everything, and the Gospel important in name only.

~Daniel Chew on " The Sanctification Debate and TGC"

Exactly what I've been saying about the plethora of heresies Killer and Piper have continued to promote without nary a word of public rebuke and repudiation from John MacArthur, Steve Lawson, and Phil Johnson. This is why I said that Together for the Gospel is also a farce.

Bottom line just might be this: Tullian isn't as famous nor a money maker  nor has he been around as long, nor is he known as a Reformer as the others are.